Archive for February 18, 2016

CC Heritage Network Symposium 2016 – Presentation Videos Live

I would like to let you know that the videos of the presentations at this year’s Heritage Network Symposium are now available at:

http://www.heritagenetwork.dmu.ac.uk/symposium/

Hope you enjoy them.

 

Nick Higgett
Connected Communities Heritage Network

The Connected Communities Catalyst Fund – Call for Proposals

Aims and purpose

 

The Connected Communities Catalyst Fund is intended to support the consolidation of exciting new ideas arising from the Connected Communities programme. Specifically, the fund is intended to explore the question: What new insights relating to the nature, dynamics and role of communities are emerging from CC projects?

The fund will provide resource for project teams to explore promising new empirical insights, practical possibilities or theoretical developments, to deepen their conversations with others working on related issues across the programme, or to challenge their ideas by connecting with others working internationally on the same themes. It will support workshops, writing/making retreats and conference activities that make progress toward substantive new outputs. The fund will be administered on a light touch basis by the Connected Communities Leadership Fellows.

On its completion in 2018, the fund will have supported a series of activities that will have contributed to the development of a substantive new body of knowledge on the theme of Connected Communities.

 

Scale of the funds:

·     Approximately £24k will be awarded annually in 2016 and 2017 (£48k total)

·     A maximum of £3k can be requested per application.

·     There will be a limit of one successful application per project team.

 

The fund will support activities such as:

·     Writing retreats to make progress on substantive collaborative outputs

·     Workshops to bring together projects working with similar or contrasting communities to share expertise and insights

·     Joint events on emerging themes and ideas on the topic of ‘community’

·     Other ideas that will achieve the aims outlined above.

 

Eligibility

·     At least two projects (from different institutions) on the CC programme must be involved

·     Both community partners and academic partners must be involved in scoping and participating in the activities

·     The award is not open to members of large grant teams (the assumption being that large grants have flexibility within their own budgets for these activities), with the exception of research assistants on large grant teams who are elegible to apply to develop their own areas of interest in collaboraiton with other projects.

·     Community Co-Investigators and Academics on projects are all eligible to apply for funding.

 

Expected outputs

·     New writing: books, websites, guidance, journal papers 

·     New multi-media, audio-visual, artistic or performance products

·     Explicitly excluded outputs are activities that are intended to develop new grant proposals and funding opportunities.

 

Payment and reporting

·     A contract will be issued from either the University of Bristol or from the University of East Anglia for the work.

·     Payment will be to a single organisation for the total amount of the grant

·     Payment will be in arrears on submission of the final report which demonstrates the activities have been successfully completed – unless there is a strong reason for access to funds in the early stages of the work.

·     Final report needs to be delivered within one month of planned project completion.

·     The final report should take the form of a 2 page A4 summary of activities including a summary of the substantive outputs achieved, supported by audio/visual material (photographs/film of the activities).

 

Eligible Costs

·     Expected costs include travel, accommodation, catering, documentation support (e.g. photography, transcription, note taking), accessibility assistance (e.g. carers, BSL translation)

·     There will be no indirect or estates costs payable and the fund will not cover academic staff time

·     Honoraria for community partners with limited economic resources will be allowable if justification is provided.

 

Expected timings

·     Activities should begin within 2 months of agreement, and complete within 9 months

 

Publicity

·     The title of the project and the proposal for the activities will be uploaded to the CC fellows website as a matter of course unless there are explicit reasons to prevent this. 

·     The final report will be uploaded to the CC fellows websites as a matter of course.

·     All outputs should be entered into Researchfish, and links sent to the CC administrators to upload onto the CC fellows website.

 

Application Process

·     No more than 2 sides of A4, including the following details

·     Primary contact name and details of the lead organisation.

·     A description of who is involved, including how community and university partners are working together

·     A description of the activity and the intended outputs

·     Budget and dates

·     The intended developments for project participants that will be achieved by the activity.

·     How the activity contributes to the development of the CC programme

·     Submitted by noon on the day of the deadline.

 

Criteria for assessment

These criteria will evolve as the fund evolves over the course of the programme. For the first call, criteria relate to:

·     The extent to which the proposal promises to clarify and articulate emerging ideas around community

·     Clarity about how community and university partners will be working together to develop new and emerging ideas

·     Value for money

·     The contribution the activities will make to the CC programme and CC community as a whole.

 

Assessment process

Applications will be reviewed by the Connected Communities Leadership Team (leadership fellows George McKay and Keri Facer, and AHRC team Gary Grubb, Sue Carver). In case of a direct conflict of interest (i.e. applications led by an individual from the same institution), then the relevant LF will not be involved in the selection process.

 

Deadlines and timings:

·     There will be four deadlines for proposals – June 30th and December 31st in 2016 and 2017 –  with approx £12k total awarded each round.

·     Activities should be completed within the following twelve months of the award.

First deadline for submissions: June 30th 2016

·     Applications to be submitted to K.Dunleavy@bristol.ac.uk

·     Applicants will be notified by end July

·     Earliest start date for projects should be September 2016.

·     Final reports will be due October 2016 

‘MUPI Partnerships in Practice’ event – the Potential of Museum University Partnerships

 

Are you interested in the potential of museum university partnerships?

If so, we encourage you to join us at the ‘MUPI Partnerships in Practice’ event on the 22 March, 2016 at Woburn House, London.
 
The past ten years have seen profound changes in how universities engage with the public. Driven by increasing pressures to deliver ‘impactful’ research and high quality student experience, museums and art galleries have emerged as natural partners for universities seeking to reach non-academic audiences for their research and engagement activities. Museums too have been seeking to enhance their research capability and to improve their interpretation of collections; to develop new audiences, and to meet the challenges of the current economic climate and decreasing public subsidy. This has encouraged them to seek new partnerships to enhance their work and build their resilience.     
 
With funding from Arts Council England, the Museum University Partnership Initiative (MUPI) project has provided an opportunity to explore the dynamics of museum university partnerships. The event will be an opportunity to:
·         Find out what we have learnt from our research (including in-depth analysis of REF case studies, a literature review, survey and interviews); our pilot sandpits; and our work with funders.  
·         Reflect on how the system supports small and medium museums to develop mutually beneficial partnerships with universities
·         Improve the potential for effective museum university partnerships in the future 
 
This event is for policy makers interested in the value of museum university partnerships; museum staff and volunteers keen to develop relationships with universities; university staff and students keen to work with museums; engagement experts keen to facilitate effective partnerships; anyone interested in how museums and universities might work better together.